Psychoactive Drugs

Psychoactive Drugs #

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

On drug (mis)regulation ๐Ÿšง #

Nora Volkow interview May 25, 2023

Nora D. Volkow, MD, is Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the National Institutes of Health

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1zVAOdzynk&t=2383s

From 39:45

Tim Ferriss: there’s so many incidental or accidental ways to ingest, for example, fentanyl. And I know of many direct stories, where people have gone to a bachelor party, they try a little bit of some drug, that ends up being cut with fentanyl. I know of two people specifically. One just dropped dead on the floor. One fell into a coma from what would’ve been considered low doses of illicit drugs. But they happened to be cut with fentanyl, which is horrifying. And in fact, my friend who died was not himself an addict. He was collateral damage. One of my other friends I grew up with, there are a lot of drug issues where I grew up, was a heroin addict. He had developed just an incredible tolerance to fentanyl, and he gave it to my other friend to help with his hangover. And my other friend had never used any opiates, and he fell asleep and just never woke up. So the sheer ease with which the fentanyl, as you mentioned, sort of permeates different corners and neighborhoods of society, which does not discriminate in terms of โ€” or I shouldn’t say it doesn’t discriminate, but it has infiltrated every socioeconomic class. It’s really pervasive and really terrifying. What is your perspective on the War on Drugs and perhaps any other approaches that you think may be more effective?

Dr. Nora Volkow: Yeah. And I’ll answer it, but I guess actually the story that you just told of your friend that how he’d be taking fentanyl unbeknowing what it was, it just killed him. And this is what we are observing a lot. And I think it’s important to educate people that this is a seriously dangerous drugs. And unfortunately, I think that we have cried wolf so many, many times that we’ve lost credibility. But if there was a way that we could convey that in very objective, we don’t need to exaggerate in any way. I mean fentanyl, two milligrams will kill you. And the counterfeit pills contain five milligrams, some of them two doses to kill you. So it is very, very tragic. But coming back to your question in terms of the War on Drugs, I think that basically what it did was it created a mechanism that could perpetuate structural racism. It is very tragic to see how its enforcement led to the incarceration of young black Americans. And again, that punitive system where someone could be stopped, and this will happen if you are black and on the notion that you had drugs with you and thrown in jail or prison because you had drugs on you is such an unfair system. And it didn’t work in any way because it did not reduce the amount of drugs that people were taking or the negative consequences of drugs to our society. So it did not work. And I think, and too, I mean one of the aspects that it did show is if you do throw a person that’s taking drugs in jail, if you criminalize that person that’s using drugs, for example, when we did horribly with crack cocaine. So if you were smoking crack cocaine, it was like, I don’t recall exactly, but it was at least 10 times greater than if you were just snorting cocaine. Snorting cocaine or injecting cocaine hydrochloride was much more favored by white people. Whereas crack was favored by black people. So cocaine hydrochloride, white, crack cocaine, black. Why do you see such a difference? It’s the same cocaine, basically. Cocaine is cocaine, and yet one could note a much higher penalty than the other. That’s an example of the consequences. But what science has shown is that when you do throw people into jail or prisons that have a problem with substance use disorders, then when they leave, they are at much greater risk of, first of all, relapsing immediately into the drug taking and escalating their drug taking. So you are exacerbating the nature of the problem by putting them in jail and prison. So it doesn’t work no matter what you do. And that’s why the whole notion of criminalizing the person that takes drugs is basically very negative vis-a-vis the outcomes of the person and also in no way it benefits society, it is actually very costly by itself. When an issue becomes politicized, then it becomes much harder to change and shift. And we’ve seen, I think, that we’ve seen over the past, I would say, certainly, five or eight years, an openness to recognizing that the War on Drugs did not work and that criminalizing drug users is basically negative and it’s promoting structural racism.

Drug harms in the UK by substance

Drug harms

Nutt, D. J., King, L. A., & Phillips, L. D. (2010). Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis. The Lancet, 376(9752), 1558-1565.

Also check out:

My experience ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿผ #

I am a sincere religious practitioner2 who is a member of

I have first-hand experience with

In general, I use psychoactive substances as entheogens. My preferred substances generally align with the opinions of the 1972 Church of the Tree of Life.6

In film ๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ #

Limitless 2011

Hamiltonโ€™s Pharmacopeia

Hamiltonโ€™s Pharmacopeia

Journey Invitation ๐Ÿ› #

I promote drug use. Why shouldn’t I?

Bad trip mythology #

A bad trip refers to a distressing and challenging experience that can occur when someone takes a psychedelic substance. Characteristics of a bad trip might include:

  • Intense Anxiety and Paranoia: Individuals may feel extreme fear, unease, or paranoia. This can manifest as a sense that something terrible is about to happen or that they are in danger.
  • Confusion and Disorientation: A person may become very confused, unable to understand their surroundings, or unable to recognize familiar people or places. They might feel lost or trapped in their own mind.
  • Emotional Distress: Strong negative emotions such as sadness, hopelessness, or despair can overwhelm the individual. These emotions can feel intense and all-encompassing.
  • Sense of Losing Control: A person on a bad trip might feel like they are losing control over their thoughts, body, or the situation around them. This loss of control can be very frightening.
  • Physical Discomfort: While primarily psychological, a bad trip can also involve physical symptoms such as nausea, chills, sweating, or a racing heart.

The likelihood of a bad trip is increased by many factors such as the use of too high a dosage, prior health conditions, lack of preparation, and taking psychedelics in an unsafe or unpredictable environment. By taking basic precautions and avoiding these known pitfalls, a bad trip becomes much less likely. Sensationalized accounts of the rare bad trip have made them seem far more common than they actually are. With a little care, you can be confident of avoiding a bad trip.7

A good analogy is food poisoning. Consuming contaminated food can lead to an unpleasant experience with nausea, indigestion, and diarrhea. However, people do not live in constant fear of food poisoning. By washing your hands thoroughly and keeping meat-borne bacteria away from raw foods like salads, the likelihood of getting sick is very low.

Another way to look at it is to compare the distress of a bad trip to the potential harms from law enforcement. Here are some potential harms ordered from least disruptive to most severe:

Almost always,89 a bad trip is no worse than arrest without prosecution.๐Ÿ”’

  1. Stop and search
  2. Confiscation of drugs
  3. Arrest without prosecution
  4. Fines and penalties
  5. Short-term detention (e.g., overnight in jail)
  6. Criminal charges and prosecution
  7. Imprisonment
  8. Asset seizure and forfeiture
  9. Violence and abuse by law enforcement
  10. Extrajudicial actions (e.g., unlawful killings)

In many cases, there exists a legal drug comparable in effect to a desired illegal drug. Or an illegal drug might be legal in particular contexts. Law enforcement is almost always8 the most dangerous aspect of drug use. For you own safety, don’t break the law. ๐Ÿšซ

Amplification #

Psychedelics are substances that reveal and amplify your inner experience.10

The subjective sense of psychedelic amplification is the reflection of a corresponding impairment of working memory.11 However, working memory is not monolithic. Different psychedelics impair different aspects of working memory. Salvinorin A impairs cognitive working memory much more than emotional working memory. Serotonergic psychedelics impair emotional working memory much more than cognitive working memory.

Can psychedelics help challenge belief systems? #

Yes, this is one of their most valuable potential benefits.4

  • Increased Openness: Psychedelics can loosen rigid thinking patterns, making individuals more receptive to considering viewpoints outside their current framework.
  • Enhance self-reflection: Increased self-awareness can expose contradictions or limitations within a person’s current belief system.
  • A tacit feeling of interconnectedness: The feeling of being part of something larger can prompt a questioning of self-imposed boundaries, leading to a potential reevaluation of beliefs about oneself and the world.

Psychedelics are not salubrious for everybody.

  • Psychedelics don’t guarantee a change in beliefs. They can also reinforce existing belief systems, especially if used with that intention.
  • There is a potential risk for individuals with already fluid belief systems to lose touch with reality and develop psychosis.

Will psychedelics be salubrious for you?

Predicting your reaction ๐Ÿน #

Your reaction to a psychedelic strongly depends on the willingness of your Parts to get quiet.12 See my discussion of effortless meditation to learn more about Parts and how to help them relax. There are at least three possible outcomes:

  • Parts are overactive and not willing to get quiet. A psychedelic will tend to make Parts more loud and extreme. This is going to be a difficult trip and corresponds to the monkey mind of an inexperienced meditator ๐Ÿ’, magnified to Godzilla size ๐Ÿฆ.13
  • Parts are active but willing to get quiet. In this situation, the client gains more access to Self energy and may do Parts work spontaneously. There is the opportunity to make rapid strides toward therapeutic goals.14
  • Parts are fairly quiet. The Self shines with unusual brilliance ๐ŸŒž because the psychedelic does the bouncer Partโ€™s job, facilitating an experience of Self that is profoundly effortless. Similar to effortless meditation, there is ample capacity for blending with a target. This is readily seen in reports of music perception under the influence of psychedelics. For example, โ€œVolunteers reported far greater absorption in music, as well as greater perceived beauty and significance of music.โ€15

Suppose you are curious to try a psychedelic but are not sure whether your Parts will get quiet.

Which psychedelic poses the least risk to the naive user?

Cannabinoids #

I agree with the cliche that cannabis is the quintessential gateway drug. However, cannabis need not be a gateway to harm, but can foster health-promoting and life-affirming experiences. The 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp-derived cannabinoids in the United States. While hemp, cannabis, and marijuana are botanically the same species, legal distinctions remain, with Delta-9 THC still prohibited since the Boggs Act of 1952.

The recent legalization of hemp-based cannabinoids spurred renewed interest in Delta-9 THC alternatives. Delta-8 THC, first isolated in the 1940s by chemist Roger Adams, offers effects similar to traditional Delta-9 THC but with less anxiety. Best of all, ฮ”8-THC can be produced legally from hemp. You might start with 20 mg each of ฮ”8-THC and CBD.

The euphoria induced by cannabis is both a benefit and a potential limitation. While euphoria may be appealing to beginners, the greater art is in taking more of an active role in shaping the experience. Once comfortable with cannabis, I suggest exploring serotonergic psychedelics.

Serotonin #

Some of the most popular psychoactive substances operate by modulating the serotonin system. Serotonin is important because it is, in part, responsible for the regulation of serenity.16 Serotonin is also known as 5-hydroxytryptamine, or abbreviated, 5-HT. There are at least 14 different serotonin receptors that allow cells to respond in various ways to the presence of serotonin. The two most prevalent brain receptors are known as 1A and 2A (also called 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A). The figure below shows the function of the two main serotonin receptors.17

Serotonin

Serotonin

Credit: Carhart-Harris & Nutt, 2017, Figure 3

Serotonin 1A #

Until recently, MDMA and 5-MeO-DMT were the popular choices believed to modulate 5-HT1A activity. 5-MeO-DMT directly modulates the 5-HT1A receptor, but MDMA influences it indirectly. MDMA seems to influence the 5-HT1A receptor by its ability to release serotonin (biology is complicated18). Psilomethoxin is a relatively new substance believed to offer roughly comparable subjective effects. The main advantage of psilomethoxin is that it is unregulated, well suited to low dosages, and easy to obtain.

Serotonin 2A #

Daime or Ayahuasca, a serotonin 2A agonist, does not spotlight any particular emotion but affectively amplifies in a pure or unbiased way. Initial use of 5-HT1A psychedelics can be seen as preparatory, akin to training wheels. If 5-HT1A is likened to vanilla ice cream, 5-HT2A offers a vast array of flavors.

Unaided, effortless meditation is precarious in the sense that we can not entertain targets that prompt much Part involvement. This is where Daime can pick up the slack. Daime can facilitate Self energy in environments that require effortful participation. For example, in Santo Daime ceremonies, everybody is expected to sing ๐ŸŽถ and dance. It seems unlikely to me that members would often enjoy much Self energy without the help of the psychedelic sacrament.

Volition #

I talk about cannabinoids and serotonergics in this order to respect the degree of volition required to enjoy them. Cannabis demands minimal active engagement - it is comparable to riding It’s a Small World at Disneyland, where one simply straps in and allows the experience to unfold. Psilomethoxin requires some facility with meditation or inner focus, though once in the groove, the experience largely guides itself. Daime, however, demands substantial volition. Daime prompts you to both control the environment and navigate simultaneously - akin to surfing but where it is your responsibility to shape the wave as well as ride it.

On Alan W. Watts ๐Ÿ”ฌ #

If you get the message, hang up the phone. For psychedelic drugs are simply instruments, like microscopes, telescopes, and telephones. The biologist does not sit with eye permanently glued to the microscope, he goes away and works on what he has seen.

Rebuttal: I agree with Watts that psychedelics can be powerful tools for self-discovery. Sometimes, like the biologist stepping away from the microscope, we need to integrate the insights from a trip, incorporating them to our daily lives. But what about journeys that do not contain a utilitarian message? Perhaps there is only an altered consciousness. Like a breathtaking vista, it may not need analysis, just appreciation. Embracing this beauty with open arms isn’t a failure to “get the message” โ€“ it’s a form of wisdom. We don’t have to be on a constant quest for self-improvement and there’s no shame in seeking help to taste the heights of beauty. ๐ŸŒบ

Self-evaluation ๐Ÿ—น / bucket list ๐Ÿชฃ #

  • Tried more than 1g psilomethoxin?
  • Currently, or in the past, indicted on a drug-related offense?
  • Tried simultaneous administration of cannabis and psilomethoxin?
  • Endured a bad trip?
  • Tried salvia divinorum?
  • Attended more than 3 Santo Daime works?

Add 1 point for each question that you answered yes. Share your results with a friend.

Notes #

  1. Nutt, D. J. (2009). Equasyโ€”an overlooked addiction with implications for the current debate on drug harms. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 23(1), 3-5. ↩︎

  2. Guide to RFRA and Best Practices for Psychedelic Plant Medicine Churches ↩︎

  3. I am a bit embarrassed to be affiliated with Catholicism given its sordid history. In general, I admire the best of all of the world’s religions. ↩︎

  4. Carse, J. P. (2009). The Religious Case Against Belief. Penguin Publishing Group. ↩︎ ↩︎

  5. Kripke, D. F., Langer, R. D., & Kline, L. E. (2012). Hypnotics’ association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study. BMJ Open, 2(1), e000850. ↩︎

  6. Hamilton Morris has a great interview with Jeremy Bigwood released on 2024 Sep 30. ↩︎

  7. See pp. 150-151: Tart, C. T. (2001). States of Consciousness. iUniverse. ↩︎

  8. Sabรฉ, M., Sulstarova, A., Glangetas, A., De Pieri, M., Mallet, L., Curtis, L., … & Kirschner, M. (2024). Reconsidering evidence for psychedelic-induced psychosis: an overview of reviews, a systematic review, and meta-analysis of human studies. Molecular Psychiatry, 1-33. ↩︎ ↩︎

  9. An exception or all’s well, ends well? Penile Replantation after Self-Amputation Following Psilocybin-Induced Drug Psychosis ↩︎

  10. Nichols, D. E., Nichols, C. D., & Hendricks, P. S. (2022). Proposed Consensus Statement on Defining Psychedelic Drugs. Psychedelic Medicine. ↩︎

  11. Healy, C. J. (2021). The acute effects of classic psychedelics on memory in humans. Psychopharmacology, 238, 639-653. ↩︎

  12. Aday, J. S., Davis, A. K., Mitzkovitz, C. M., Bloesch, E. K., & Davoli, C. C. (2021). Predicting reactions to psychedelic drugs: A systematic review of states and traits related to acute drug effects. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science, 4(2), 424-435. ↩︎

  13. The potential adverse events are similar to what you might get with a meditation session gone wrong, but worse. ↩︎

  14. MDMA and PTSD STUDIES ↩︎

  15. Barrett, F. S., Preller, K. H., & Kaelen, M. (2018). Psychedelics and music: Neuroscience and therapeutic implications. International Review of Psychiatry, 30(4), 350-362. ↩︎

  16. Olivier, B., & Mos, J. (1990). Serenics, serotonin and aggression. Progress in clinical and biological research, 361, 203-230. ↩︎

  17. Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Nutt, D. J. (2017). Serotonin and brain function: a tale of two receptors. Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 31(9), 1091-1120. ↩︎

  18. Ray, T. S. (2010). Psychedelics and the human receptorome. PloS One, 5(2), e9019. ↩︎

Calendar December 25, 2024